Target Audience

College Professors

...
Art of Learning
...
Teaching for Learning Assurance
Art of Learning - College Professors

Ability to learn is a skill! - Brian Herbert

Learning how to learn is an essential skill for all learners, particularly for our younger generation in colleges and universities.

With this skill, scoring a centum in University Exams and success in Competitive Exams like, PG NEET, GATE, TANCET, GMAT, GRE, CA, Service Selection Boards, State Public Service Commission, UPSC exams etc., will be very much within their reach.

We equip the learners with this essential skill through our “Art of Learning Program”. The program is specifically designed to enhance the learning capabilities at the same time reduce their cognitive load. This is a 20 hour program, offered through contact and online classes.

We propose the following two programs for College Professors:
  • Art of Learning.
  • Teaching for Learning Assurance

The Art of Learning Program addresses the academic challenges faced by students and methods used to overcome them. Students normally listen to us, when they are convinced, not when they are advised. Hence this program is designed with the research findings from the domains of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, biology, and pedagogy, so that they can be convinced of their real capabilities and responsibilities towards their own development. Also, we cannot expect our students to excel in their academics without teaching them how to learn.

With the contribution of all the internal stakeholders, viz., students, parents, professors, and authorities, college education can be revolutionized. The objective of “Teaching for Learning Assurance”, Program is to ensure that learning happens in the classrooms. The contents of this program can be co-created to meet the specific requirements of your institution.

Program Details - Art of Learning Register for Online Program Register for Contact Program
Teaching for Learning Assurance

Teacher's interest and enthusiasm are contagious!

After investing multiple hours in preparatory work, we enter our classrooms with lots of hope and deliver the fruits of our hard work. Students do respond well in the classroom and homework assignments. Parents also extend their full cooperation in their ward’s academic development. Still with all the good intentions and support of stakeholders, ie., teachers, students, and parents, many are disappointed with the test performance. Rightly, educational leaders have been raising the slogan, “You are teaching, are they learning? in educational conferences.

A wealth of knowledge has been developed out of research on the topic from different parts of the globe. With the help of these research findings, we can easily solve the problem and move the class average mark towards centum and its standard deviation towards zero.

The contents of this program can be co-created to maximise the score from the following NBA Criteria. Similarly, NAAC, NIRF, and ABET Criteria can also be considered.

Tier I Instituitions

NBA Criterion Title Allotted Score
2.2 Teaching Learning Process
2.2.1 Describe Processes followed to Improve Quality of Teaching & Learning 15
2.2.2 Quality of End Semester Examinations, Internal Semester Question Papers, Assignments and Evaluation 15
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes 75
3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes 75
4 Student’s Performance
4.2.1 Success Rate Without Backlogs in any Semester / Year of Study 15
4.2.2 Success Rate in the Stipulated Period of the Program 5
4.3 Academic Performance in Second Year 10
5.6 Innovations by Faculty in Teaching and Learning 10
7 Continuous Improvement
7.1 Action Taken Based on the Results of Evaluation of each of the COs, POs and PSOs 30
7.2 Academic Audit and Action taken thereof during Period of Assessment 15
8 First Year Academics
8.3 First Year Academic Performance 10
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of First Year Courses 10
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes from First Year Courses 20
9 Student Support Systems
9.1 Mentoring System to help at Individual level 5
9.2 Feedback Analysis and Reward/ Corrective measures taken if any 10
9.4 Self – Learning 5
10.4.1 Quality of Learning Resources (hard/soft) 10
Total Allotted Score 355

Tier II Instituitions

NBA Criterion Title Allotted Score
2 Program Curriculum and Teaching- Learning Process
2.1.2 State the Delivery Details of the Content Beyond Syllabus for Attainment of POs and PSOs 10
2.2.1 Describe Processes followed to Improve Quality of Teaching & Learning 25
2.2.2 Quality of Internal Semester Question Papers, Assignments and Evaluation 20
2.2.3 Quality of Students Projects 25
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes 50
3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes 50
4 Student’s Performance
4.2.1 Success Rate Without Backlogs in any Semester / Year of Study 25
4.2.2 Success Rate in the Stipulated Period of Study 15
4.3 Academic Performance in Third Year 15
4.4 Academic Performance in Second Year 20
5.5 Innovations by Faculty in Teaching and Learning 25
6.2 Additional Facilities Created for Improving the Quality of Learning Experience in Laboratories 25
7 Continuous Improvement
7.1 Actions Taken Based on the Results of Evaluation of each of the POs and PSOs 20
7.2 Academic Audit and Action taken thereof during Period of Assessment 10
8.3 First Year Academic Performance 10
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of First Year Courses 10
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes from First Year Courses 20
9 Student Support Systems
9.1 Mentoring System to help at Individual level 5
9.2 Feedback Analysis and Reward/ Corrective measures taken if any 10
9.4 Self – Learning 5
10.4.1 Quality of Learning Resources (hard/soft) 10
Total Allotted Score 395
Program Details - Teaching for Learning Assurance Register for Online Program Register for Contact Program